Carmichael v. Lathrop
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by Marilla B. Carmichael against Ada M. Lathrop and Emily B. Lloyd to charge the defendants with the value of certain property alleged to have been conveyed to them in partial satisfaction of their legacies under the will of Henry P. Pulling, deceased. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The will of Henry P. Pulling was executed in June, 1872. After giving his wife the use and enjoyment of all of his property during life, in lieu of dower, it provided that—
‘ ‘ Second. All the remainder of the estate of, in, and to my said property, both real and personal, subject to the said life estate of my said wife, I give, devise, and bequeath to my three daughters, Ada M. Lathrop, of Detroit, Michigan, Emily Lloyd, of Albany, New York, and Marilla B. Carmichael, of Amsterdam, New York, and to their heirs forever, share and share alike. * * *
“Third. I hereby authorize and empower my…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lansing v. HaynesMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Burnham v. . ComfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Arthur v. ArthurNew York Supreme Court · 1850
- Weston v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Wallace v. Du BoisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- YIVO Institute for Jewish Research v. ZaleskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Austin v. AustinNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Youngerman v. YoungermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Kramer v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912
- Johnson v. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.