Homestead Development Corp. v. Ayres
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to defendants in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted that part of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment dismissing the fifth affirmative defense in the answer. The contention that a complaint fails to state a cause of action is not properly asserted as an affirmative defense (see, Guglielmo v Roosevelt Hosp. Staff Hous. Co., 222 AD2d 403; Propoco, Inc. v Birnbaum, 157 AD2d 774, 775; Falk v MacMasters, 197 App Div 357, 362), and, in any event, the complaint alleges facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Propoco, Inc. v. BirnbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Falk v. MacMastersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Schooley v. MannionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Giangrosso v. Kummer Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004