Legal Opinion
Casteel v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 17, 2003No. 02-2267PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
DAWSON, District Judge.
On this 17th day of April 2003, there comes on for consideration the Defendant’s Motion to Stay Action and Compel Arbitration, (doc. # 5). Plaintiffs filed suit against their former employer, Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc., under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e), (Title VII), and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act, ARK Code. Ann. §§ 16-123-105 et seq., (ACRA), alleging hostile work environment sex discrimination; gender discrimination; retaliation; and constructive discharge. Defendant has filed a motion to stay the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Salau v. DentonDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2015