Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Heide Betz appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of David P. Como, Robert Vile, First Republic Bank, and Trainer Wortham and Company (collectively, “defendants”) on Betz’s claims, under California law, of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligent misrepresentation, and unfair business practices.1 The district court held that the claims were barred by the respective statutes of limitations for each of these claims.2 We reverse and remand each claim to the district court.
I
First, we hold that Betz’s breach of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Grisham v. Philip Morris U.S.A., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
- Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Aryeh v. CANON BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2010