Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Zabelle

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1996No. C022925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Following the denial of his motion to suppress (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), defendant Michael St. Clair Zabelle pleaded no contest to a charge of possession of heroin for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.)

Sentenced to state prison, defendant appeals, contending his motion to suppress was erroneously denied. We shall affirm the judgment.

Facts

Defendant’s motion to suppress was adjudicated following a special hearing in superior court. The relevant evidence adduced upon that hearing (People v. Neighbours (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 1115, 1119-1120 [273 Cal.Rptr. 32]) is as follows:

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Duke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. Rodriguez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. HoxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API