Legal Opinion

In re Schmitt

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 1, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Bankruptcy. On question certified by referee.

1Opinion of the Court

WING, District Judge.

The question arising in this case is certified by Mr. Harold Remington, referee, for review of order. The facts, in brief, appear to be as follows: That a chattel mortgage was executed and delivered by Schmitt to Benton, Myers & Go. on August 7, 1899, and was filed by the mortgagees in the proper office on November 11, 1899; that the mortgage was given to secure an indebtedness of- about $1,200, then past: due, and was upon fixtures in the store of Schmitt; that the mortgage was not filed by the mortgagees until the date named, and was withheld from filing at the request…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Gibson v. WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. James Forrester & Co. v. Kearney National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McVay v. EnglishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Gilbert v. DeckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crosby v. RidoutCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API