Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rag (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, LP v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 2004Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that Ronald A. Hopton’s (Claimant) psychic injury was not caused by abnormal working conditions because: (1) Claimant had an injured psyche and was predisposed to mental problems; (2) homosexual harassment is (normal in the mining industry); and (3) Claimant cited only three incidents of homosexual harassment over an eight-day period. (Majority op. at 12.) However, I submit that the majority’s holding is contrary to case law and, moreover, ignores the credibility determinations and findings of fact made by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. City of Pittsburgh v. LoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API