Rag (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, LP v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
Judge FRIEDMAN.
I respectfully dissent. The majority holds that Ronald A. Hopton’s (Claimant) psychic injury was not caused by abnormal working conditions because: (1) Claimant had an injured psyche and was predisposed to mental problems; (2) homosexual harassment is (normal in the mining industry); and (3) Claimant cited only three incidents of homosexual harassment over an eight-day period. (Majority op. at 12.) However, I submit that the majority’s holding is contrary to case law and, moreover, ignores the credibility determinations and findings of fact made by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- City of Pittsburgh v. LoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.