State v. Keenan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Defendant Waller, an attorney, appeals from a contempt judgment, ORS 33.030, and contends that her refusal to disclose the dates on which she had conferences with a former client in an aggravated murder prosecution is protected by the attorney-client privilege and the duty of an attorney to maintain the confidences and preserve the secrets of a client. We affirm.
On October 18,1985, Waller, an attorney in the public defender’s office, was appointed to represent defendant Keenan as a suspect in the murder of Webb, but before he was charged. Before that appointment, Keenan had been interviewed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
- State v. JancsekOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Cole v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. BiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KeenanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. KeenanOregon Supreme Court · 1989