Legal Opinion

State v. Keenan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1988No. C8612-36601; CA A43996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

Defendant Waller, an attorney, appeals from a contempt judgment, ORS 33.030, and contends that her refusal to disclose the dates on which she had conferences with a former client in an aggravated murder prosecution is protected by the attorney-client privilege and the duty of an attorney to maintain the confidences and preserve the secrets of a client. We affirm.

On October 18,1985, Waller, an attorney in the public defender’s office, was appointed to represent defendant Keenan as a suspect in the murder of Webb, but before he was charged. Before that appointment, Keenan had been interviewed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  2. State v. JancsekOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Cole v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. BiltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KeenanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. KeenanOregon Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API