Legal Opinion

Margaritis v. Vast Mountain Development Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 18, 2022No. 2:20-cv-00807Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 William Margaritis, No. CV-20-00807-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Vast Mountain Development Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff William Margaritis alleges that he invested $850,000 plus labor in 17 Defendant Vast Mountain Development Incorporated’s (“VMD”) Congress Mine Gold & 18 Silica Recycling Project (“the Project”) in exchange for a fractional working interest in the 19 Project. Margaritis claims he was led to be believe that gold extraction would be a 20 significant component…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API