Legal Opinion

Hoover v. Horton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 5, 1948No. 5834PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMPKIN, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the court sustaining appellee’s plea of privilege to be sued in Lubbock County, the county of his domicile, rather than in Deaf Smith County, where, the appellant contends, venue is fixed by Article 1995, Subdivisions 9 and 14, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes.

The appellant, Charlie Hoover, and the appellee, G. K. Horton, operate neighboring farms in Deaf Smith County. Alleging damages in the amount of $1,546 to his growing crops, fences, and land by reason of the manner in which appellee had plowed his farm, the appellant instituted this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. OakesTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Barron v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Sims v. Trinity Farm Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Jackson v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Allison v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  2. Deaton & Son, Inc. v. Miller Well Servicing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Preston v. SchrenkIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Pickens v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Rogers v. ScalingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API