Legal Opinion

Empire Finance Co. v. Elliott

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1928No. 1356PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFunk, J.

Admitting that the record shows no evidence of general agency and that there is no evidence of any course of dealing, neither of which were claimed by plaintiff, and that it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to show that Charles Biteman was the agent of the Finance Co. in signing and filing the affidavit and that he had express authority to do so, it is not claimed that such agency must be proven by direct evidence, and it is conceded it may be proven by circumstantial evidence; in other words, that such agency may be inferred from the acts and conduct of the parties.

The admitted facts and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ray v. City Bank & Trust Co. of Natchez, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1973
  2. Nunn v. DavidsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Davis v. TunisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API