Legal Opinion
United States v. Gustavo Gomez-Villamizar
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 23, 1992No. 92-1228PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Gustavo Gomez-Vil-lamizar appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance (“Count I”) and possession of a controlled substance on board an aircraft arriving in the customs territory of the United States (“Count III”). 1 In so doing, defendant argues that: (1) as a matter of law, he lacked the criminal intent to be found guilty under Counts I and III; and (2) the evidence was legally insufficient to convict him under either Counts I or III. Finding neither argument persuasive, we affirm.
I
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Martha Mejia-LozanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Gloria Patricia Ocampo-GuarinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Alfredo NuevaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Claudio Gonzalez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BergodereCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Jose De Jesus-Rios, A/K/A Papo Rios, United States v. Eva RiosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Angel Luis Morales-Cartagena, United States of America v. Wilfredo Alvarado-OrtizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.