Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Dorst

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Warren Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

In this case, the Court below rejected a paragraph of an answer denying the truth of the affidavit in attachment, and, exception was taken. That this was error, is settled in Foster v. Dryfus, 16 Ind. 158. But there was no motion for a new trial, and the question is, can the error be now taken advantage of on appeal? We think, according to Kent v. Lawson, 12 Ind. 675, a motion for a new trial on the ground of the error was- not necessary. This was not an error affecting the trial of an issue formed, but preventing the forming of an issue to try.

The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kent v. LawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Foster v. DryfusIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Excelsior Fork Co. v. LukensIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Lupton v. CoffelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API