Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Pallas

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 14, 1928No. 11,910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whitford

This is an action in ejectment against Pallas, the lessee, after notice of forfeiture for the nonpayment of rent at the time designated in the lease, also for the use of the premises for purposes alleged to he inhibited by its express terms. Defendant Jones, as assignee of the lease, intervened. At the conclusion of the evidence the court directed a verdict for the defendant in error. The plaintiff in error comes here to review the judgment entered on the verdict.

Defendant in error, Pallas, leased the premises from Thomas Hughes, now deceased, the father of the plaintiff in error, for five…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Down v. ComstockIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hazen v. National Rifle Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Murphy v. TraynorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  3. Lindner Packing & Provision Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  4. Beck v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Hughes v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API