Legal Opinion

United States v. Teehan

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 27, 1956No. Civ. No. 16251PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BHUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this action seeks to recoup overpayments of family allowance benefits.

There is no doubt that the defendant, Jane Teehan, received from the plaintiff allotment checks totalling $320 to which she was not entitled from the period June, 1942 through September 30, 1943.

The Government exhibits show that allotments were provided for in the payroll records of defendant, James Teehan, when he was a private in the United States Army, and that they were not deducted from his pay, and that they were paid to him in cash. His signature is affixed to the payroll…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steele v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WooldridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. DorganDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1958
  3. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  4. United States v. WooldridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API