Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Wooldridge

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 2, 1959No. 12,638Published

1ConcurrenceFerguson, Judge

I concur in the result.

I agree with the conclusion of the principal opinion that an enlisted member of the military service has such a property interest in a Class Q allotment check, designed to pay a basic allowance for quarters, that the endorsement thereon of his wife’s signature does not constitute an injury to her upon which the competency of her testimony over his objection may be predicated. I premise my concurrence upon the member’s contribution to the allowance represented by the instrument; the clear intent of Congress that he be “entitled to receive a basic allowance for quarters,”…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. United States v. RoarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. BrysonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. RobbinsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
  5. United States v. TeehanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API