Legal Opinion

Templeton v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1853PublishedCited by 12 opinions

•Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioner'*s Court,

1Opinion of the Court

Gamble, Judge.

In this case, the court having given certain instructions to the jury, after the evidence was closed, the plaintiffs asked that they might be allowed to take a nonsuit, *102but the court refused to permit it, and a verdict and judgment were given for the defendant.

The statutes of this state have always recognized the right of a plaintiff to take a nonsuit, and have limited its exercise to the time previous to the retiring of the jury to consider their verdict. This practice is not affected by the code, being entirely consistent with it.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stith v. J. J. Newberry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. West v. McMullenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. MetalstaffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. Board of Education ex rel. Philip Carey Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Lawyers' Co-Operative Publishing Co. v. GordonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API