Legal Opinion

Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Metalstaff

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1900No. 1,289PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In Error to the Circuit. Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, Circuit Judge..

In this case, which was a suit for personal injuries, after the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, the plaintiff in error, who was the defendant below, asked an instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence directing the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant railway company. The trial court announced its intention to give the instruction; whereupon, before the jury had retired from the court room or returned a verdict, the plaintiff below, through his counsel, asked leave to take a nonsuit. The trial court granted such leave, holding that it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. NUDD v. Burrows, AssigneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Lawrence v. ShreveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  4. Greene County Bank v. GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  5. Templeton v. WolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Francisco v. Chicago & A. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Knight v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  3. Falvey v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  4. Connecticut Fire Ins. v. ManningCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  5. Schaffer v. Deemer Manufacturing Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API