Legal Opinion
Troue v. Marker
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 1969No. 468A59PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the doctrine of denying a wife a recognized cause of action for loss of the consortium of her husband should be abrogated or sustained.
Appellant’s husband was severly injured in an automobile accident precipitated by the allegedly negligent driving of defendant-appellee, Franklin Marker. Appellant alleged in her complaint that as a result of the accident her husband was hospitalized for 159 days during which time he underwent surgery seven times; and that after being released he re*113turned to the hospital four more times for corrective…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDaniel v. McDanielIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Burk v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Harris v. Young Women's Christian Assn. of Terre HauteIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- Brown v. KistlemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- In Re Petitions to Transfer Appeals From Appellate Court to Supreme CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Troue v. MarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Elder v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Pallikan v. MarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Simmons v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.