Raymond L. J. Riling, Inc. v. Schack
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
This is an action in assumpsit to recover a balance alleged to be due on a parol agreement for alterations and improvements made by plaintiff corporation to defendants’ residence. The jury returned a verdict for defendants. Plaintiff then moved for a new trial and the learned court below ordered that, upon payment of two hundred and fifty dollars within thirty days by defendants to plaintiff, the motion for a new trial would be discharged, otherwise it would be granted. Plaintiff refused to accept defendants’ tender of the money whereupon the court ordered the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradwell v. Pittsb. Etc. Pass. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Lemon v. CampbellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Lehr v. BrodbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Genzel v. HalvorsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Caudle v. SwansonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Dougherty v. McLaughlinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Arcidiacono v. Timeless Towns of the Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kaiser v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.