Legal Opinion
JAMES BY AND THROUGH JAMES v. Unified School Dist. No. 512
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 28, 1997No. Civil Action 95-2380-GTVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Charlie M. James brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the events relating to his expulsion from high school for possession of a handgun on school property violated his Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The case is before the court upon motions for summary judgment based on qualified immunity by defendants Marjorie P. Kaplan and Harlan Hess (Doc. 41) and defendants Mark Hotzel and Tom Hayselden (Doc. 45). 1 For the reasons stated below, the motions are granted.
I. Background
The following facts are from…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- G.M. ex rel. B.M. v. CasalducDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- State v. BestNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Butler Ex Rel. Butler v. Rio Rancho Public School Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2002