Thomas v. Thomas
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant argues the trial court erred in awarding plaintiff $25,200.00 quantum meruit for breach of an implied contract. We agree.
Recovery on quantum meruit must rest upon implied contract. Lindley v. Frazier, 231 N.C. 44, 55 S.E.2d 815 (1949). This theory requires the plaintiff to show by the greater weight of the evidence that the services were rendered and accepted by both parties with the mutual understanding that plaintiff would be compensated for her services. Twiford v. Waterfield, 240 N.C. 582, 83 S.E.2d 548, (1954).
In Suggs v. Norris, 88 N.C. App. 539, 364 S.E.2d 159,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Collins v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Johnson v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Twiford v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Doub v. HauserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scott v. United Carolina BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah & Fouts, PLLC v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Silverman v. Miller (In Re Silverman)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993
- Adams, Kleemeier, Hagan, Hannah & Fouts, PLLC v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Rabinowitz v. SuvillagaNorth Carolina Business Court · 2019