Legal Opinion

Lundblad v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of contract brought by a citizen of Worcester in this Commonwealth against an in*159surance corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York and having its usual place of business at Boston in our county of Suffolk.

The plaintiff’s declaration is as follows: “And the plaintiff says that on or before the 6th of November, 1926, the defendant had issued and entered into at the city of Providence, in the State of Rhode Island, a certain policy of insurance or agreement to and with the Interstate Motor Coach Corporation, a corporation duly organized under the laws of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Exchange Bank v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Dean v. American Legion of HonorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Klefbeck v. DousMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Nissenberg v. FellemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Goldberg v. Preferred Accident InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Kana v. FishmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. In re the Receivership of International Re-Insurance Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API