Legal Opinion

Wright v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 2004No. A03A2414PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

Robert Lee Wright was convicted by a jury of the sale of a controlled substance. This Court affirmed his conviction in an unpublished opinion, Wright v. State, 250 Ga. App. XXVI (2001), but remanded for a hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Following that hearing, the trial court denied Wright’s motion for new trial based on his ineffective assistance claim and denied his motion for funds to hire an expert. Wright appeals these adverse rulings.

1. Wright contends his trial counsel was ineffective.

To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dewberry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  3. Cupe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Ware v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brodes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Robison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Skaggs-Ferrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API