Legal Opinion
Stamey v. State Highway Commission of Kansas
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 12, 1948No. Civ. 6051PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROADDUS, District. Judge.
1. The plaintiffs, Cleve Stamey of the State of Kansas and Thomas Stamey of Oklahoma, a copartnership with its principal place of business within Kansas, bring •this action against the State Highway Commission of the State of Kansas under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, for a declaration of the rights and obligations of the parties under a certain contract for highway construction let to plaintiff in 1941, and halted thereafter by a stop order issued by the War Production Board. The theory presented by the plaintiffs is that this is an action arising under the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DeLong Corporation v. Oregon State Highway Com'nDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1964
- S. J. Groves & Sons Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
- Hamilton Manufacturing Company v. The Trustees of the State Colleges in ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- O'Neill v. EarlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Lane v. DashiellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.