Legal Opinion

Klein v. City of Keokuk

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided January 26, 1989No. 87-409PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HABHAB, Judge.

When the plaintiffs filed their action in the district court, they divided their petition *23into three divisions so as to claim relief against the city under division I for a decree abating a nuisance allegedly created by the city and for a money judgment because of damages caused by such nuisance and under division II for a money judgment because of damages allegedly caused by negligent acts of the city. Each of these divisions prayed for further equitable relief. The third division urged a claim against the city engineer, Scott Feh-seke. That division was dismissed by the trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Oakes v. Peter Pan Bakers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. Montgomery Properties Corp. v. Economy Forms Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Dickman v. Truck Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Pedersen v. KuhrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Sponsler v. Clarke Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chumbley v. Dreis & Krump Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1993
  2. Seneca Waste Solutions, Inc. v. D & K Managing Consultants, LLC D/B/A Motor City Plant Services, Keith Koskela, and Mps Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API