Legal Opinion

Preuss v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 7, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5564PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge.

Appellees, real estate brokers, had sued appellants for a sales commission involved in an unsuccessful attempt to sell appellants’ home. Appellants moved for summary judgment, and appellees filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. On June 22, 1983, after hearing arguments on the motion, the trial court took the matter under advisement and confirmed a previously set trial date of August 30, 1983. On Friday, August 19, appellants delivered to appellees’ attorney an offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 68, Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S., in the amount of $1,301.00. On the same…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mubi v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Twin City Construction Co. of Fargo v. CantorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Centric-Jones Co. v. HufnagelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  2. Wersch v. Radnor/LandgrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. Kroener v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Hernandez v. United Supermarkets of Oklahoma, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API