Legal Opinion

Munz v. Abramson

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 4, 1953No. File No. 47969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff's complaint is in one count. It purports to allege two causes of action against the defendant, one sounding in nuisance and the other in negligence. Good pleading required that these respectively alleged causes of action be stated in separate counts. Practice Book § 34. This aspect, however, is not before the court and will be passed.

In abbreviated form the subordinate allegations of the complaint for present purposes read: The defendant was the owner of a tenement house having three floors and the plaintiff as a tenant occupied a furnished room on the third floor. Each floor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webel v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Harris (Et Ux.) v. Lewistown Tr. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Nolan v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
  4. Martel v. MaloneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Croughwell v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jubb v. MaslankaConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
  2. Fonseca v. LavadoConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
  3. O'Neil v. MarulliConnecticut Superior Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API