Legal Opinion

People v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1935No. Crim. 2801PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

Appellant was convicted after a trial by the court without a jury of assault with a deadly weapon. This is an appeal from the judgment and order denying a new trial.

Viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution (People v. Dukes, 90 Cal. App. 657, 659 [266 Pac. 558]), the facts in the instant case are:

Appellant about 2 A. M., while driving his automobile, accidentally struck a car, parked without lights. As he left his car the complaining witness, Mr. Rice, approached him, inquiring if he could be of assistance. Receiving no answer to his repeated queries, he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. People v. DukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. People v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. People v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Alsup v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. NovelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API