People v. Howard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
Appellant was convicted after a trial by the court without a jury of assault with a deadly weapon. This is an appeal from the judgment and order denying a new trial.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to the prosecution (People v. Dukes, 90 Cal. App. 657, 659 [266 Pac. 558]), the facts in the instant case are:
Appellant about 2 A. M., while driving his automobile, accidentally struck a car, parked without lights. As he left his car the complaining witness, Mr. Rice, approached him, inquiring if he could be of assistance. Receiving no answer to his repeated queries, he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. DukesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. GibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Alsup v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. NovelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953