Legal Opinion

Padzensky v. Kinzenbaw

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 18, 1984No. 83-198PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHULTZ, Justice.

The question here is whether an assignment of a cash appearance bond was an absolute transfer or one intended to create a security interest. The district court held that the assignment, absolute on its face, was intended to create a security interest. It further ruled that a judgment lien creditor had priority over the assignee, under Iowa Code section 554.9301(l)(b) since the assignment was never perfected. We disagree and reverse.

The defendant, David R. Kinzenbaw, hired the Tom Riley Law Firm, P.C. (Riley) to represent him in a suit initiated by his landlord, Linda…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Broyles v. Iowa Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Kintzel v. Wheatland Mutual Insurance Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  3. Verschoor v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. A. Y. McDonald Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Scott v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. In Re PaulUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1988
  3. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Cedar Rapids v. LalaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1986
  4. Hunter v. EcholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Dutton v. Kondora (In Re Kondora)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API