Legal Opinion

Stanley v. Mueller

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1960PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This is a proceeding for a determination of the validity of the claim of the defendant, Emil Mueller, in the estate of his wife, Esther M. Mueller, deceased. It has its origin in the statement of election, filed by him in her estate pursuant to the provisions of ORS 113.050 ① (Oregon Laws 1949, ch 475, p 714, as amended by Oregon Laws 1951, ch 386, p. 610), and wherein he declined to take under Mrs. Mueller’s will, but in lieu to receive one-fourth of the personal property of the estate, as defined by ORS 113.050, supra.

Plaintiff Stanley is the administrator c.t.a. of Mrs. Mueller’s estate.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Panushka v. PanushkaOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In re Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Ashbaugh v. AshbaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Union Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2011
  2. In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
  3. Losey v. LoseySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  4. Reserve Life Insurance v. HowellOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. LongDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API