Legal Opinion

Joseph Vernarsky v. Starbucks Corporation

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 13, 2026No. 1:25-cv-02308Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell Civil Action No. 25–cv–02308–MDB JOSEPH VERNARSKY, Plaintiff, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Starbucks Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. ([“Motion”], Doc. No. 51.) Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition (Doc. No. 53), to which Defendant has replied (Doc. No. 54). After reviewing the Motion, briefing and relevant law, the Court ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. SUMMARY FOR…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Casanova v. UlibarriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Bixler v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API