United States v. Juvenile Male
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Two juvenile criminal defendants, J.C.D. and T.J.S., challenge the district court’s orders transferring them from juvenile to adult status. We vacate both transfer orders and remand for further proceedings.
I
In its order transferring J.C.D., the district court abused its discretion by making two clearly erroneous material findings of fact. First, the district court found that “[t]here is no record of abuse while [J.C.D. was] in foster care.” This is contrary to the evidence in the record. Dr. Beyer’s psychological evaluation states that J.C.D.’s mother “reported that he was also…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leaburn ALEXANDER, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Sakhawat Ullah, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Katherine Gosho-KimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. A.R., a Male Juvenile, A.R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Guy W. Olano, Jr., United States of America v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008