Legal Opinion

Nichols v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1883PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, Young, L, presiding, overruling her demurrer to the answer.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

Section 20, chapter 8, of the act incorporating the city of Minneapolis, reads: “No action shall be maintained against the city of Minneapolis on account of any injuries received by means of any defect in the condition of any bridge, street, sidewalk, or thoroughfare, unless such action shall be commenced within one year from the happening of the injury, nor unless notice shall have first been given in writing to the mayor of said city, or the city clerk thereof, within 30 days of the occurrence of such injury or damage, stating the place where and the time when such injury was received, and…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Henry v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Szroka v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Harder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. City of Lincoln v. GrantNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Town of Monticello v. KennardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API