Legal Opinion
United States v. Irene Rubio Garcia
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 3, 1970No. 23269PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant Garcia appeals from a conviction for violating 21 U.S.C. § 174. Error in admitting Garcia’s inculpatory statements obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, compels reversal of her conviction and a remand for a new trial from which those statements will be excluded.
After Garcia was arrested, federal agents repeatedly questioned her. During the course of the interrogation sessions, the agents gave her several different versions of the Miranda bundle of warnings. On no occasion was a warning given fully complying with Miranda.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- David Matthew Lathers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Eddie Huless Gilpin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States of America, and v. Ascencion Vasquez-Lopez, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
3Cited by52 opinions
- California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schade v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- United States of America Ex Rel. Ruben Williams v. John Twomey and Peter BensingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. Mariano Faisao MendiolaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.