Adams v. . Van Alstyne

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The facts set out in the justice's return, though not very clearly stated, seem to be substantially as follows: The plaintiff and the defendant were in possession of adjoining farms; that of the plaintiff was a part of a farm formerly owned by Jacob Loop, and the defendant's farm formerly belonged to John C. Hogeboom. The two farms of Hogeboom and Loop were divided by a line running nearly east and west, that of Hogeboom being on the southerly, and that of Loop…