Legal Opinion

Carey v. Schweitzer

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 28, 1926No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

Subject to an exception under certain circumstances, with respect to cattle being lawfully and properly driven on the public highway (Minor & Wurtz on Real Property, 117; 3 C. J. 133, § 403; Erdman v. Gottshall, 9 Pa. Super. St. 295), which exception need not be considered here, the common-law rule required every person, by fences or otherwise, to keep his cattle on his own premises, and if they strayed upon his neighbor’s lands, they were trespassers and the owner was liable. 3 C. J. 125, § 393; Minor & Wurtz on Real Property, 116, 117;…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bronson v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Rust v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  3. Lyons v. MerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Barber v. MenschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Erdman v. GottshallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Villani v. Wilmington Housing AuthoritySuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
  2. Matthews v. McVayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Barnes v. PleasantonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950
  4. Gregory Co. v. Bailey's Adm'r.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1845

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API