State v. Dockery
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Defendant’s only assignment of error is that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed to all criminal defendants by the Sixth Amendment to the Federal Constitution and Article 1, Section 23 of our State Constitution. The standard for evaluating the effectiveness of appointed counsel in a criminal trial is that of “reasonably effective assistance.” Strickland v. Washington, --- U.S. ---, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984); State v. Vickers, 306 N.C. 90, 291 S.E. 2d 599 (1982). In Strickland, the United States Supreme Court, for the first time, elaborated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. KinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Smith v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Ernest P. McCarver v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- State v. StroudCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.