Legal Opinion
United States v. Llantada
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 8, 2016No. 15-2082PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge.
Most federal criminal sentences require prisoners to comply with various limitations on their conduct and behavior as a condition of release from prison. Typical conditions, for example, prohibit parolees from abusing alcohol or drugs, or associating with felons. We recently held that the district court does not err when it imposes conditions of release of this sort. United States v. Muñoz, 812 F.3d. 809, 815-16, 2016 WL 502863, at *3 (10th Cir.2016). Our decision in Muñoz resolves most of the challenges to the special conditions imposed in this case. But Llantada also…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Domingo BlountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. MikeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Anthony EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. CabralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- State v. Willy LevittSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- United States v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Shawn LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.