Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Scott
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 29, 1991No. 85 C 7160PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Edward Hamilton (“Hamilton”) has sued former Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“Department”) Michael Lane (“Lane”), Stateville Correctional Center (“Stateville”) Warden Michael O’Leary (“O’Leary”) and three other Department officials — Vern Scott (“Scott”), Samuel Ingram (“Ingram”) and Abraham Flagg (“Flagg”) — under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). Hamilton’s Amended Complaint (the “Complaint”) 1 seeks damages and a declaratory judgment based on alleged violations of his Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Edward Hamilton v. Michael O'leary, Michael P. Lane, Vern ScottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Wright v. CoughlinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Butler v. Oak Creek-Franklin School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- Gavin v. McGinnisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Benford v. WrightDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.