Oden v. King
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The appeal was taken under the 6 months’ statute from final decree (sustaining demurrers and dismissing the bill), under section 6078 of the Code, and not under section 6079 providing for appeals from certain interlocutory decrees.
We have considered, in another case between these parties and others, the effect of assigning demurrers to the whole bill containing several aspects. Oden v. King et al. (Ala. Sup.) 113 So. 609; Thompson v. Brown, 200 Ala. 382, 76 So. 298; Hudson v. Hudson, 204 Ala. 75, 85 So. 282; Bank v. Dunnavant, 204 Ala. 656, 87 So. 105; City of Birmingham v. L. & N. R. Co.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Oden v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Bank of New Brockton v. DunnavantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Hauser v. Foley & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Fletcher v. First Nat. Bank of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Hatton v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Boutwell v. DrinkardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- City of Anniston v. Anniston Office Bldg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.