Legal Opinion

Rosanoff v. Duquesne University

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1950No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff recovered a jury’s verdict in his suit for damages for the defendant’s breach of an alleged oral contract for the plaintiff’s professional (teaching) services. Thereafter, the court below ordered a new trial on the ground that “In the interests of justice there must be a new trial.” From that order, the plaintiff has appealed.

The trial judge who wrote the opinion for the court en banc on the award of the new trial, expressed himself as “. . . convinced from the questions, the attitude and the manner of the jury when they appeared for further…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Reese v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Weinfeld v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Kerr Et Ux. v. Hofer (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Held v. VAN TIGGELENSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. ChopakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Commonwealth v. ChopakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API