Legal Opinion
Sema v. Automall 46 Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 24, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
894 A.2d 77 (2006)
384 N.J. Super. 145
Zefkiser A. SEMA and Merita Sema, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
AUTOMALL 46 INC., Nissan 23, Nissan 46 Mitsubishi, Defendants-Appellants, and
John Corino, Frank Esposito, and Julio Maldonado, Defendants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 21, 2005.[1]
Decided March 24, 2006.
Robert J. Bennett, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Betsch and Bennett, attorneys, Teaneck; Mr. Bennett, on the brief).
Donald J. Maizys, argued the cause for respondents (Feitlin, Youngman, Karas & Youngman, attorneys, Fair Lawn; Mr. Maizys, on the brief).
Befo…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Weinberg v. Sprint Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Rivera Castillo v. Autokirey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Gonzalez v. Safe & Sound Security Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Romano v. Galaxy ToyotaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Chakravarti v. Pegasus Consulting Group, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Gonzalez v. Wilshire Credit Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- Nebraskaland, Inc. v. River Street Idealease, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
- Best v. C & M Door Controls, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.