Legal Opinion

Drier v. Helvering

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 4, 1934No. 6131PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

This is a tax ease. Petitioner, an American citizen, inherited in 1913 a certain prop^ erty located in Saxony, which was seized by the German government during the war (1918), and sold on January 5, 1920, with the approval of the German government. Petitioner filed a claim with the Mixed Claims Commission, which resulted January 14, 1925, in an award to petitioner of $48,000, together with interest at the rate of 5 per cent, annually from January 5, 1920, to the date of payment. Pursuant to this award, petitioner on August 1, 1928, received $68,-782.70 from the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kieselbach v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. KieselbachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SpeyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Seaside Improvement Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Helvering v. DrierCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API