Legal Opinion

State v. Contreras

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 29, 2020No. 119584PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 119,584 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JOSE ARMANDO CONTRERAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. K.S.A. 60-404, which requires a contemporaneous objection to the admission of evidence, does not apply to the question of law whether a witness has a right to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. 2. A district court's Fifth Amendment ruling is not a judgment to which the doctrine of acquiescence applies. That doctrine has limited application in criminal cases. 3. A defendant must be permitted to present a complete…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ContrerasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API