State v. Contreras
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 119,584 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JOSE ARMANDO CONTRERAS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A party seeking to admit evidence over a claimed Fifth Amendment privilege has the burden to provide the district court with substantial competent evidence that there is in fact no privilege to assert. 2. When reviewing a district court's decision to exclude testimony due to a claimed Fifth Amendment privilege, appellate courts are limited to determining whether the lower court's factual findings were supported by substantial competent evidence and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kansas v. VentrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kansas v. CheeverSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. CheeverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. CarapezzaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HardwickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
- State v. HoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
- State v. ShowalterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022