Legal Opinion

Zimmermann v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1989Published

1Opinion of the Court

764 S.W.2d 757 (1989)

In re John ZIMMERMANN, An Attorney Licensed and Admitted to the Practice of Law in Tennessee, Respondent/Appellant,

v.

BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.

January 23, 1989.

William M. Leech, Jr., Corabel Alexander, Waller, Lansden, Dortch and Davis, Nashville, for respondent/appellant.

National Dist. Attys. Ass'n, Tennessee Attys. Gen. Conference amici curiae, for respondent/appellant.

Joseph L. Mercer, II, Harold Levinson, pro hac vice Vanderbilt University, Nashville, for appellant.

Tennessee Ass'n of Criminal Defense…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chicago Council of Lawyers v. William J. Bauer, and Terence MacCarthy Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  2. 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 20, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,029 Wesley P. Bernard v. Gulf Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. Kemner v. Monsanto Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hirschkop v. SneadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LasswellOregon Supreme Court · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API