Hanson v. Central Show Printing Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
We state the material facts which were before the court as made by the plaintiff’s evidence; and for the purpose of our consideration of the propriety of the ruling of the trial court in granting the defendant’s motion for a peremptory verdict and entering judgment thereon, we take them as true. The governing rule at this point is well established.
The ease as made by the plaintiff’s evidence is that he was a skilled pressman, and had been in the employ of the defendant-corporation at Mason City for many years prior to 1959. In the autumn of that year he had an opportunity to obtain a steady…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lynas v. Maxwell FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Carnig v. CarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
- Littell v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Skagerberg v. Blandin Paper Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Lord v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Allen v. Highway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- Stauter v. Walnut Grove ProductsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Collins v. Parsons CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Moody v. BogueCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
- Kunzman v. Enron Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.