Legal Opinion

Schiffer v. Slomin's, Inc.

Nassau County District Court

Decided June 26, 2013Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gary F. Knobel. J.

The unopposed motion by defendant Slomin’s, Inc. (hereafter Slomin’s) for an order granting leave to reargue the denial of its prior motion — to dismiss the claim made by plaintiff Raviv, to stay this action and to direct plaintiff/claimant Schiffer to proceed to arbitration — is granted (see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1979]). Upon reargument, for the reasons stated below, the court adheres to its order dated February 14, 2013 (39 Misc 3d 414 [2013, Knobel, J.]), which denied the relief requested by defendant in its entirety.

This is a small…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API