Legal Opinion

Regenstein v. State Revenue Commission

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 27, 1938No. 26779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

Louis A. Regenstein and Mrs. Venia L. Regenstein, husband and wife, instituted the present action against the *95State Revenue Commission for a recovery of certain alleged over-payments in income taxes for the years 1934 and 1935, under the Code, § 92-3308. It was alleged that “on or before the 15th day of March, 1935, petitioners filed a joint income-tax return for the calendar year 1934, including therein all the income of Louis Regenstein and Venia L. Regenstein;” that the income of Louis Regenstein was in excess of $3500, to wit, $15,175.91, but the income of Venia L. Regenstein was less…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hoeper v. Tax Comm'n of Wis.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Blaylock v. HackelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Standard Oil Co. of Kentucky v. State Revenue CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  4. Mundy v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. Jordan v. HarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burke v. Life Insurance Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Burke v. Life Insurance Co. of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. State Revenue Commission v. RichCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API